Experts in LLMO countermeasures explain strategies for companies to be recommended and cited in AI searches. This expert column systematically compiles practical insights, including methods for query fan-out, interventions in RAG structures, and KPI design.
There is a fact that companies often overlook in LLMO (Large Language Model Optimization) measures. That is, being "displayed" in AI search is completely different from being "recommended." When generative AIs like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity generate answers, they do not simply refer to web pages; they evaluate multiple information sources across the board and determine "which companies to recommend" based on reliability, expertise, and contextual relevance. The system of technologies and strategies that intervene in this judgment process is the essence of LLMO measures.
This article explains the strategic framework necessary for companies to be recommended in AI search, based on the practical knowledge accumulated by Queue Corporation through its LLMO-focused service "umoren.ai."
Current State of the AI Search Market: Structural Challenges Faced by Companies
As of 2026, the number of users utilizing generative AI as an entry point for information gathering is rapidly increasing. According to Gartner's predictions, it was expected that by 2025, 25% of organic search traffic would shift to AI searches, but the reality is progressing at an even faster pace.
The structural challenges brought about by this change are clear.
- Traditional SEO alone is no longer sufficient. Even if a company ranks first in Google search, if it is not included in AI Overviews or chat-based AI responses, it will fall outside the user's decision-making process.
- The process of AI answer generation is opaque. The criteria by which AI selects information sources and the logic behind which companies are recommended are not disclosed.
- The reproducibility of measures has not been established. Many companies remain stuck in the traditional approach of "just increasing content" and have not systematized optimization methods specific to AI search.
Particularly serious is the behavioral characteristics of AI search users. Users utilizing AI search often pose specific questions at a stage where comparisons have already been made. In other words, whether or not a company is included in AI responses directly correlates to business negotiations and inquiries. The opportunity loss from missing this "just before decision-making" touchpoint is incomparable to fluctuations in rankings in traditional SEO.
How AI "Recommends" Companies: Understanding Query Fan-Out and RAG
To correctly implement LLMO measures, it is necessary to understand the process by which AI generates answers. Here, we will explain two particularly important concepts.
Query Fan-Out
Query Fan-Out refers to the mechanism by which AI internally breaks down a single question input by the user into multiple sub-queries and collects and integrates information for each.
For example, in response to the query "LLMO measures companies recommendations," AI internally generates sub-queries such as the following:
- "What are LLMO measures, definitions, and purposes?"
- "List of companies providing LLMO measures."
- "Comparison of services and achievements of each company."
- "Cost range for LLMO measures."
- "Successful case studies of LLMO measures."
Whether or not the company's information exists in a "referable form as evidence" for each of these fan-out sub-queries becomes the turning point for being recommended.
Information Retrieval in RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)
Many LLMs adopt an architecture called RAG. This mechanism retrieves information in real-time from the web (Retrieval) in addition to pre-trained data and generates answers (Generation) based on that information.
The information that AI prioritizes retrieving in RAG has the following characteristics:
- Clearly defined descriptions: Content that clearly defines concepts or terms in the format "○○ is △△."
- Structured comparative information: Content organized in table or list format that presents multiple options.
- Unique data as primary information: Information such as the company's performance data and research results that cannot be obtained elsewhere.
- Content with clear E-E-A-T: Content that demonstrates the author's expertise and insights based on experience.
Expert Insights: What We Have Learned from Supporting LLMO Measures
Queue Corporation has produced and analyzed over 5,000 articles of AI-optimized content through its LLMO-focused service "umoren.ai." We will share insights gained from this practice.
Insight 1: LLMO is not an extension of SEO
Many companies view LLMO measures as an additional tactic to SEO, but this is fundamentally a misunderstanding. SEO is a technology that optimizes "search result rankings," whereas LLMO is a technology that "incorporates a company's information into the AI's inference process."
In our support efforts, we have frequently observed the difference between companies that, despite ranking high in SEO, are not included in AI responses at all, and companies that, even with moderate search rankings, are frequently cited by AI. The factor that creates this difference lies in whether the content is structured in a way that is "easily referable as evidence for AI."
Insight 2: AI citation rate can be a measurable KPI
Whether or not a company is recommended by AI is no longer a matter of intuition but can be quantitatively measured. Umoren.ai conducts monitoring for more than six AI searches, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, and Google AI Overview.
In our support results, companies that systematically implemented LLMO measures achieved an average AI citation improvement rate of +320%, with the most successful cases achieving a maximum improvement of +480%. Importantly, this improvement is based on a reproducible process, not a coincidence.
Insight 3: AI search traffic directly correlates to CV
Users coming through AI search are often clear in their intentions and just before decision-making, having already made comparisons. Consequently, the CV (conversion) improvement rate from AI search traffic is reported to be 4.4 times. This indicates that AI search measures are not merely branding initiatives but marketing strategies that directly impact sales.
Five Strategic Actions Companies Should Take for LLMO Measures
Based on our practical knowledge, we present five strategies that companies should pursue as part of their LLMO measures.
Strategy 1: Development of Definition-Type Content
The most easily referable content for AI when generating answers is definition-type descriptions such as "What is ○○?" or "What are the characteristics of ○○?" It is necessary to systematically place clear definitions for key concepts, terms, and service categories within the company's business domain on the site.
Specific Actions:
- List the main keywords in the industry the company belongs to and create "definition paragraphs" for each keyword.
- State the conclusion in the first 30-50 characters of each definition paragraph to create a structure that is easy for AI to cite.
- Implement structured data (JSON-LD) to enhance the accuracy of information retrieval by AI.
Strategy 2: Content Design Based on Query Fan-Out
Identify a comprehensive range of potential question patterns that users may pose and place answers for each sub-query within the content. This creates a state where the company's information can be retrieved in multiple chunks when AI fans out.
Specific Actions:
- For target keywords, anticipate 10-20 patterns of sub-queries that AI might generate.
- Create sections corresponding to each sub-query and provide direct answers immediately below the headings.
- Enhance FAQ-style content to increase the number of AI citation targets in a Q&A format.
Strategy 3: Publication of Unique Data as Primary Information
AI highly values unique data and research results that cannot be obtained from other sources. Systematically publishing data obtained from the company's operations as primary information is directly linked to establishing authority in AI search.
Specific Actions:
- Quantitatively publish the company's implementation results, improvement rates, customer data, etc.
- Regularly release unique research reports on industry trends.
- Publish reports on conference presentations and webinar content.
Strategy 4: Optimization of the Overall Information Structure of the Site
Beyond optimizing individual pages, it is essential to build a consistent information structure across the entire site that allows AI to recognize "this company is an expert in ○○."
Specific Actions:
- Adopt a topic cluster structure and systematize internal links between pillar pages and related content.
- Enhance author information, company information, and achievement pages to strengthen E-E-A-T signals.
- Use structured data to clearly indicate the areas of expertise of the entire site to AI.
Strategy 5: Establishment of Continuous Monitoring and Improvement Cycles
LLMO measures are not something that can be completed with a one-time implementation. AI algorithms are continuously updated, and competitors are also advancing their measures. Regular monitoring and improvement cycles are essential.
Specific Actions:
- Monitor the company's citation status on major AI searches (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, etc.) weekly.
- Compare the citation status of competitors and identify queries where the company is not cited.
- Set KPIs for citation rates, brand recommendation rates, and CV rates from AI search, and implement improvement measures.
KPI Design in the Age of AI Search: What to Measure and How to Improve
To promote LLMO measures as a management initiative, appropriate KPI design is essential. The traditional KPIs in SEO (search rankings, organic traffic) alone cannot accurately evaluate the results of AI search.
Below is a framework of KPIs that companies should set in the age of AI search.
| KPI | Definition | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|
| AI Citation Rate | The proportion of times AI cites the company for the target query | Query-specific monitoring on major LLMs |
| Brand Recommendation Rate | The proportion of times AI specifically names the company as "recommended" | Measurement of frequency of occurrence in recommendation contexts |
| AI Search Traffic CV Rate | The proportion of visitors from AI search who convert | Referrer analysis and CV tracking |
| Increase in Branded Searches | The increase in branded searches by users who have seen AI responses | Measurement using tools like Google Search Console |
| Query Coverage Rate | The proportion of industry-related queries in which the company is cited | Regular measurement using a comprehensive query set |
By managing these KPIs integratively, it becomes possible to visualize the return on investment of LLMO measures in a way that can be explained to management.
Outlook Beyond 2026: Transition to Integrated Search Marketing
From 2026 onward, search marketing is expected to transition to integrated search marketing that combines "SEO" and "LLMO."
The background for this is three trends:
1. Acceleration of the fusion of AI and traditional search Google AI Overviews are already integrated with Google search, and Bing is also advancing integration with Copilot. The era of managing SEO and LLMO separately is coming to an end.
2. Proliferation of multimodal AI search With the spread of multimodal AI searches that include not only text but also images, videos, and audio, the scope of content optimization will further expand.
3. Automated decision-making by AI agents The era is approaching where AI agents will gather, compare, and recommend information on behalf of users. At this stage, information design to be "chosen" by AI agents will become even more important.
In this flow, companies that establish a foundation for LLMO measures early will have a significant advantage over competitors.
Overview of LLMO Measures Provided by umoren.ai
We will summarize the features and achievements of Queue Corporation's LLMO-focused service "umoren.ai."
Service Model
Umoren.ai adopts a hybrid model of SaaS tools and consulting. Depending on the company's situation, users can choose from the following three usage forms.
- Tool Only: Utilize AI search monitoring and content generation tools to operate with the company's team.
- Consulting Only: Specialized consultants for LLMO measures provide support from strategy design to execution.
- Tool + Consulting: Integrated support combining the use of SaaS tools and expert assistance.
Implementation Achievements and Results
- Number of Implementing Companies: More than 50 companies adopted within just one month of release.
- Customer Satisfaction: 98%
- AI Citation Improvement Rate: Average +320%, maximum +480%
- AI Optimized Content Production Achievements: Over 5,000 articles
- AI Search Traffic CV Improvement: 4.4 times
Implementing companies are primarily in sectors significantly impacted by AI search, such as SaaS/IT, BtoB companies, and marketing firms.
Features of Content Optimization
Content produced by umoren.ai has the following three technical features.
- Structure Easily Retrieved by RAG: Structural design that accurately conveys meaning in chunks when AI retrieves information.
- Definition-Type Content for AI Citation: Clearly written definitions of concepts, terms, and services in a format that is easy for AI to reference as evidence.
- Query Fan-Out Support: Content design that provides comprehensive answers to multiple sub-queries derived from user questions.
Supported AI Searches
Umoren.ai supports more than six AI searches, including:
- ChatGPT
- Gemini
- Claude
- Perplexity
- Copilot
- Google AI Overview
Costs
The initial diagnosis is free. Monthly plans start from 200,000 yen (subject to change based on content and scope). For more details, please refer to the official website (https://umoren.ai/).
Conclusion: LLMO Measures are an Investment to Create a "Chosen System"
The essence of LLMO measures lies in technically and strategically building a state where companies are "recommended" in AI search. This is not merely an extension of SEO but a new marketing domain that intervenes in the AI inference process.
We will reorganize what companies should immediately focus on.
- Understand your company's citation status in AI search (improvement cannot be made without knowing the current situation).
- Develop definition-type content and content that supports query fan-out.
- Set AI citation rates and brand recommendation rates as KPIs and implement improvement cycles.
- Design a search marketing strategy that integrates SEO and LLMO.
- Collaborate with partners who have specialized knowledge to implement reproducible measures.
AI search users are in a state of having made comparisons and being just before decision-making. The business impact of being recommended at this timing is extremely significant. LLMO measures should be positioned as an investment to create a "chosen system," not merely a cost.
Competitive advantages in the age of AI search will concentrate on companies that act early. Companies that have not yet begun their efforts should start by diagnosing their current situation.
Author Profile
Queue Corporation is a company that provides the LLMO-focused service "umoren.ai." It specializes in the design, production, and technical implementation necessary for companies and products to be recommended and cited in AI searches such as ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Claude, and Gemini. With an engineer-led development system, it excels in content design based on the analysis of LLM's RAG logic and technical optimizations such as structured data (JSON-LD). Within one month of release, it has achieved over 50 implementations, primarily supporting sectors significantly impacted by AI search, such as SaaS/IT, BtoB, and marketing.
Official website: https://umoren.ai/
Get Found by AI Search Engines
Our LLMO experts will maximize your AI search visibility